全文获取类型
收费全文 | 209篇 |
免费 | 42篇 |
国内免费 | 90篇 |
专业分类
测绘学 | 1篇 |
地球物理 | 18篇 |
地质学 | 306篇 |
海洋学 | 3篇 |
综合类 | 9篇 |
自然地理 | 4篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 5篇 |
2022年 | 3篇 |
2021年 | 10篇 |
2020年 | 9篇 |
2019年 | 12篇 |
2018年 | 10篇 |
2017年 | 8篇 |
2016年 | 16篇 |
2015年 | 12篇 |
2014年 | 13篇 |
2013年 | 14篇 |
2012年 | 16篇 |
2011年 | 8篇 |
2010年 | 15篇 |
2009年 | 20篇 |
2008年 | 14篇 |
2007年 | 15篇 |
2006年 | 14篇 |
2005年 | 10篇 |
2004年 | 9篇 |
2003年 | 14篇 |
2002年 | 7篇 |
2001年 | 5篇 |
2000年 | 13篇 |
1999年 | 10篇 |
1998年 | 11篇 |
1997年 | 7篇 |
1996年 | 15篇 |
1995年 | 9篇 |
1994年 | 5篇 |
1993年 | 3篇 |
1992年 | 2篇 |
1991年 | 2篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1987年 | 3篇 |
1980年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有341条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
41.
“岩浆热场”说及其成矿意义(下) 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
上篇(张旗等[1])初步讨论了岩浆热场说的概念,本文为下篇,主要谈应用,探讨它与成矿作用的关系。研究表明,岩浆热场说对热液成矿作用有重要的意义,可能解决了岩浆热液成矿作用中许多很难解释和争议很大的问题:如钨锡与金铜为什么相伴的问题,矿床为什么大多是多金属成矿的问题,远离侵入体的夕卡岩成因问题,成矿为什么滞后于花岗岩的问题,为什么有些岩体成矿,有些岩体不成矿的问题,为什么大规模岩浆活动与大规模成矿作用息息相关的问题等。岩浆热场与煤和油气成藏有关是一个重要的发现。岩浆热场对煤和油气生成、运移、聚集的影响主要表现在加速烃源岩的热演化,使生油门限变浅,使烃源岩进入高成熟或过成熟,使烃源岩中残余有机质丰度降低。令人感兴趣的是,岩浆热场说还导出了一个"成矿组合"的概念,所谓成矿组合是指在一个或大或小的区域内,在岩浆活动集中的时间段范围内,在热场的统一作用下所形成和影响的所有矿床,不论成因和矿种,均属于一个成矿组合。它包括下述4种类型的矿床:岩浆热液矿床、热泉型矿床、层状热液矿床及生物有机质矿床等。岩浆热场说对于找矿也有启示:首先,我们可以从3个不同的级别上(大规模岩浆活动级别;成矿带、成矿区、矿集区级别;单个矿床级别)规划找矿布局;其次,在岩浆热场的统一影响下将金属矿床和非金属矿床、热液矿床和沉积矿床、无机质矿床和有机质矿床联系起来;第三,推进不同类型矿床研究的互补和交流。看来,岩浆热场对于成矿的作用是最值得学术界关注的,它也许可以改变我们目前对成矿作用的某些根深蒂固的认识,开拓出一个新的领域,推进矿床学研究进入新的时代。 相似文献
42.
从宏观基础地质入手,按矿床学的一些基本概念,针对东川-易门铜矿床地质地球化学特征,探讨了一些存在争议的重要问题。研究认为:狮山段是绿汁江组下部独立存在的地层层位;东川-易门式铜矿床属沉积-改造成因,其中的层状铜矿属沉积成岩成因,不是"热液成矿";所谓东川-易门式矿床(稀矿山除外)为"喷流沉积成矿"或"岩浆叠加",尚依据不足;刺穿体是构造作用产物,对成矿有利,是良好的找矿标志,其中的角砾岩主要是沉积角砾岩与构造角砾岩,或沉积-构造角砾岩,不足以冠名"隐爆角砾岩(筒)"。 相似文献
43.
贾公台金矿为甘肃党河南山地区规模最大的金矿床。为探索深部矿化、寻找盲矿体,在贾公台矿段开展原生晕研究,建立原生叠加晕轴向分带,发现贾公台金矿具反向分带特征。说明该矿体深部存在多期次成矿作用。结合地井五方位测井,预测深部3 200 m标高以下存在盲矿体。深部钻探发现了厚度大、品位高的多层金矿体,新增金资源量12吨,取得了显著找矿成果。构造叠加晕结合地井五方位测井成功圈定贾公台金矿深部矿体的实践,对同类矿床的深部找矿具有重要指导意义。 相似文献
44.
通过对贾公台金矿开展系统的原生晕研究工作,初步建立了矿区原生叠加晕轴向分带(自上而下):W-Mo-Bi-Ni-Co-Cu-Zn-Pb-Ag-Au-Sb-As,认为区内成矿热液具有多期次叠加成矿的特点,深部前缘晕元素异常发育,预示深部找矿前景较好,预测深部盲矿靶位在3200 m标高以下。 相似文献
45.
Geological history from the late Palaeoproterozoic to early Neoproterozoic is dominated by the formation of the supercontinent Columbia, and its break-up and re-amalgamation into the next supercontinent, Rodinia. On a global scale, major orogenic events have been tied to the formation of either of these supercontinents, and records of extension are commonly linked to break-up events. Presented here is a synopsis of the geological evolution of southwest Fennoscandia during the ca. 1.9–0.9 Ga period. This region records a protracted history of continental growth and reworking in a long-lived accretionary orogen. Three major periods of continental growth are defined by the Transscandinavian Igneous Belt (1.86–1.66 Ga), Gothian (1.66–1.52 Ga), and Telemarkian (1.52–1.48 Ga) domains. The 1.47–1.38 Ga Hallandian–Danopolonian period featured reorganization of the subduction zone and over-riding plates, with limited evidence for continental collision. During the subsequent 1.38–1.15 Ga interval, the region is interpreted as being located inboard of a convergent margin that is not preserved today and hosted magmatism and sedimentation related to inboard extensional events. The 1.15–0.9 Ga period is host to Sveconorwegian orogenesis that marks the end of this long-lived accretionary orogen and features significant crustal deformation, metamorphism, and magmatism. Collision of an indenter, typically Amazonia, is commonly inferred for the cause of widespread Sveconorwegian orogenesis, but this remains inconclusive. An alternative is that orogenesis merely represents subduction, terrane accretion, crustal thickening, and burial and exhumation of continental crust, along an accretionary margin. During the Mesoproterozoic, southwest Fennoscandia was part of a much larger accretionary orogen that grew on the edge of the Columbia supercontinent and included Laurentia and Amazonia amongst other cratons. The chain of convergent margins along the western Pacific is the best analogue for this setting of Proterozoic crustal growth and tectonism. 相似文献
46.
Absolute ages of migmatization in the polymetamorphic, parautochthonous basement of the Sveconorwegian Province, Sweden, have been determined using U–Pb ion probe analysis of zircon domains that formed in leucosome of migmatitic orthogneisses. Migmatite zircon was formed by recrystallization whereas dissolution–reprecipitation and neocrystallization were subordinate. The recrystallized migmatite zircon was identified by comparison of zircon in mesosomes and leucosomes. It is backscatter electron‐bright, U‐rich (800–4400 ppm) with low Th/U‐ratios (generally 0.01–0.1), unzoned or ‘oscillatory ghost zoned’, and occurs as up to 100 μm‐thick rims with transitional contacts to cores of protolith zircon. Protolith ages of 1686 ± 12 and 1668 ± 11 Ma were obtained from moderately resorbed, igneous zircon crystals (generally Th/U = 0.5–1.5, U < 300 ppm) in mesosomes; protolith zircon is also present as resorbed cores in the leucosomes. Linkage of folding, synchronous migmatization and formation of recrystallized zircon rims allowed direct dating of south‐vergent folding at 976 ± 7 Ma. At a second locality, similar recrystallized zircon rims in leucosome date pre‐Sveconorwegian migmatization at 1425 ± 7 Ma; an upper age bracket of 1394 ± 12 Ma for two overprinting phases of deformation (upright folding along gently SSW‐plunging axes and stretching in ESE) was set by zircon in a folded metagranitic dyke. Lower age brackets for these events were set at 952 ± 7 and 946 ± 8 Ma by zircon in two crosscutting and undeformed granite–pegmatite dykes. Together with previously published data the present results demonstrate: (i) Tectonometamorphic reworking during the Hallandian orogenesis at 1.44–1.42 Ga, resulting in migmatization and formation of a coarse gneissic layering. (ii) Sveconorwegian continent–continent collision at 0.98–0.96 Ga, involving (a) emplacement of an eclogite unit, (b) regional high‐pressure granulite facies metamorphism, (c) southvergent folding, subhorizontal, east–west stretching and migmatization, all of which caused overprint or transposition of older Mesoproterozoic and Sveconorwegian structures. The Sveconorwegian migmatization and folding took place during or shortly after the emplacement of Sveconorwegian eclogite and is interpreted as a result of north–south shortening, synchronous with east–west extension and unroofing during late stages of the continent–continent collision. 相似文献
47.
鄂尔多斯盆地侏罗纪西界分析 总被引:6,自引:1,他引:5
鄂尔多斯盆地西界,特别是其早—中侏罗世盆地西界,由于不同期次、不同性质的构造相互叠加而模糊不清,究竟是在贺兰山以西还是现在银川盆地以东的问题,至今尚无共识,极大地影响着矿产资源的评价和找矿战略的部署。本文在前人工作的基础上,通过针对性的野外工作,分析和筛分了不同时期的古构造,探讨了晚侏罗世和早—中侏罗世盆地的西界。文章认为,鄂尔多斯盆地西部巨大的近南北向挤压构造形成于晚侏罗世,而东西向的挤压构造则出现于晚三叠世。两期方向截然不同的挤压构造相互叠加,构成了鄂尔多斯盆地西部复杂的叠加构造和不规则的盆地西界。晚期挤压构造较为清晰,表现为近南北向的逆冲推覆构造带和纵贯盆地南北的“古脊梁”,使盆地西界退缩到桌子山东麓断裂、横山堡—磁窑堡断褶带以及马儿庄冲断裂和崆峒山断裂以东。早期挤压构造受后期构造的叠加改造,断断续续,时隐时现。近东西向挤压构造受古亚洲域的影响,是印支运动的产物,近南北向挤压构造转受滨太平洋域的作用,是燕山运动的表现。在古亚洲域向太平洋域转换过程中的早—中侏罗世,鄂尔多斯盆地西部出现了近东西向的拉张伸展,在盆地内部表现为近东西向隆起凹陷的古地形,使盆地西缘波状弯曲,而非平直,“银川古隆起”和“汝箕沟—鄂尔多斯盆地”两者并存,并不矛盾。早—中侏罗世盆地西界可能远至阿拉善地块。上述中生代构造又经新生代构造改造,变得更加复杂多样,甚至面目全非。如不注意构造筛分,中生代构造乃至盆地边界的研究就会被误导,从而得出错误结论。 相似文献
48.
A Paleozoic subduction complex dominates the Mossman Orogen developed at the northern extremity of the Tasmanides, eastern Australia. Its southern part, displayed in the Broken River Province, is characterised by dismembered ocean-plate stratigraphy in which turbidite-dominated packages and widespread tectonic mélange development are characteristic. The Broken River complex is characterised by formations with quartzose sandstone alternating with those largely formed of sandstone of more labile character. The two compositional groups are considered to reflect separate, age-significant sedimentary regimes, but their ages have hitherto been poorly constrained. With the use of 1082 concordant detrital zircon ages from 13 samples we provide age control for the complex and track its sedimentary provenance. Of quartzose units, the Tribute Hills Arenite and Pelican Range Formation are late Cambrian–Early Ordovician, and the Wairuna Formation is Middle to Late Ordovician, in age. The more labile units (Greenvale, Perry Creek and Kangaroo Hills formations) are collectively of late Silurian–mid-Devonian age. Development of the complex spanned some 130 Myr. Continent-derived sediment involved in accretion of much the complex, from mid-Ordovician to mid-Devonian, was largely sourced from a nearby magmatic arc of late Cambrian–Devonian age, now represented by granitoid plutons of the Macrossan and Pama igneous associations. An older far-field Pacific-Gondwana sediment source is characteristic of early-phase (late Cambrian–Early Ordovician) accretion, in common with sedimentary units of this age generally developed in the Tasmanides. We consider the complex to have grown largely by underplating that positioned younger components beneath those that are older, with out-of-sequence thrust interleaving of these components occurring late in the accretionary history. A Late Devonian contractional folding and cleavage development (Tabberabberan orogenesis) is uniformly expressed across the entire complex and reflects an abrupt change in plate engagement with imposition of a compressional stress regime. 相似文献
49.
Thomas Bernard Hugh D. Sinclair Mark Naylor Frdric Christophoul Mary Ford 《Basin Research》2021,33(1):118-137
The transition to a post‐orogenic state in mountain ranges has been identified by a change from active subsidence to isostatic rebound of the foreland basin. However, the nature of the interplay between isostatic rebound and sediment supply, and their impact on the topographic evolution of a range and foreland basin during this transition, has not been fully investigated. Here, we use a box model to explore the syn‐ to post‐orogenic evolution of foreland basin/thrust wedge systems. Using a set of parameter values that approximate the northern Pyrenees and the neighbouring Aquitaine foreland basin, we evaluate the controls on sediment drape over the frontal parts of the retro‐wedge following cessation of crustal thickening. Conglomerates preserved at approximately 600‐m elevation, which is ~ 300 m above the present mountain front in the northern Pyrenees are ca. 12 Ma, approximately 10 Myrs younger than the last evidence of crustal thickening in the wedge. Using the model, this post‐orogenic sediment drape is explained by the combination of a sustained, high sediment influx from the range into the basin relative to the efflux out of the basin, combined with cessation of the generation of accommodation space through basin subsidence. Post‐orogenic sediment drape is considered a generic process that is likely to be responsible for elevated low‐gradient surfaces and preserved remnants of continental sedimentation draping the outer margins of the northern Pyrenean thrust wedge. 相似文献
50.